Back on E13 of Conspiracy Theories and Unpopular Culture when I told you that I had some great guests on deck; I wasn’t lying. This next guest is one of the most explosive defenders of the Christian faith who will definitely blow your mind with his perspective on the Illuminati’s New Age deception. Join us as we chop it up on the story of Bloodstain Lane, how he found his way back to the true Christian faith, the sad state of today’s hip hop culture, who will win the Mayweather vs. Pacquiao fight, and much more.

You can also subscribe to the CTAUC podcast on iTunes or on Stitcher and if you enjoy the show, please provide a review- we REALLY need these reviews more than you know! If there are more reviews, the show will not only improve but it will get the message out to the masses.

Here are the links to all of Bloodstain Lane’s social media connections that we’ll be talking about- be sure to follow and help spread his message:

Twitter: @Bloodstain Lane

YouTube channel- The Team Takeover:

Tumblr: The Holy Heel Blog

Bloodstain Lane on Instagram

Also- be sure to drop a couple bucks on a fellow brother of Christ’s GoFundMe so he can start his podcast and help spread the word (it’s super-simple; I dropped a few bucks on it as well).

Finally; here’s the show, enjoy:

(*as always- there is some explicit language but it’s not over the top vulgar; my apologies for those that are offended)

Listen to “Conspiracy Theories and Unpopular Culture Podcast E15- "Bloodstain Lane"” on Spreaker.

Another option is to watch it on YouTube (again- subscribe and give some comments or feedback- we’d LOVE to hear what you think):

Thanks for listening, drop your comments below, and be sure to leave some reviews for the show if you like it!

-Isaac

Skyrim Fiend says

March 11, 2015 at 6:09 pm

I understand what you’re saying but I’m not a Jew. I am a follower of Jesus. Jesus had ample opportunity to address homosexuality and didn’t. He condensed the 613 (or 663 depending on if you’re Hasidic/Chasidic) into 2 and at certain points even addressed the “Law” as being from Moses instead of God (Moses gave you those laws for the hardness of your hearts, but I tell you from the beginning it was not so). He does discuss marriage, that there is no excuse for divorce, that there is a proper relationship, but also that in Heaven there is no such thing as male or female. If homosexuality was an abomination as many protestants define it, then he would have called it out with the same rancor as he did usury, money lending, hypocrisy, and a lack of charity.

In fact, if sexual sins were unforgivable then he would not have saved the adulteress from a TANAKH mandated stoning. That was also the law.

He said we have two commandments, love God and love our neighbor as ourselves. We do have, however, a guidance for a proper way to live that is respectful to ourselves, nature, and others.

Even still, what we see in Leviticus was a priestly code that would set that class of Jew above in purity, and was not necessarily given what we know of Jews then something that everyone would be able to aspire to. It is why there is a phrase used S-yag la Torah (to build a fence around the Torah) because people just couldn’t do it. Moreover, within that code the same words are used “unclean” which is just not the same as abomination. That same word is used for the breaking of any of those laws from lying to what you do on the Sabbath.

There are more instances that condemn people for not taking the Sabbath as a day of complete rest (not Golf, not barbecuing, etc) but worshiping the Most High than for any sexual sin. It is a day of profound observance, not watching football. There are more instances that condemn people who choose not to forgive others of sins (read up on that period between Rosh Hashana and Yom Kippur) than for homosexuality. People who do not forgive monetary debts after 7 years are also condemned, so why do we think low of people who declare bankruptcy? Why do we not protest FICO scores?

In the book of Matthew Chapter 25 Jesus absolutely predicates our salvation on good works but because of Paul we throw that out and believe in this idea that all we have do is accept Jesus as Savior. I dunno.

Either Jesus is Messiah and the Gospels are our religion with his words as the final say on God’s will or we (people claiming Christianity) should all just be Jews who see the Torah as fulfilled and worship as Orthodox Jews.

I am so imperfect, flawed, and hopeless that I’ll stick with the Gospels.

It is not a mark of trying to accept modern ways because I don’t think that homosexuality is the intended sexual relations for humans. Penises…vaginas…obviously God (and for the atheists–what evolution produced as the most survivable and advantageous solution) intended for that to be the way to procreate and the way we should raise families.

However, I don’t see sexual “sins” as different than me lying to my boss about being sick. That wasn’t true. It’s not different than me lying to my auto loan company when I forgot to mail the check. We all sin and every sin has equal weight because it is all wrong.

If we have a hierarchy of sin, then it should be as Jesus said and that is that sin which hurts our neighbor that we are to love as ourself.

I’m not being an apologist, I just see that it is easy to say that this group or that group is “worse” because that particular group and it’s push for acceptance is leading to a whole breakdown of culture and religious tradition unintentionally.

The average gay person just wants to live their life and be happy. Some are radical and want to destroy tradition, but most just want to come home from work and have someone there with them that loves them. Do I alienate that person or persons from the love of Christ by telling them their sin?

Maybe if I was perfect I could, but I’m a horrible hypocrite in so many ways that I would be frightened of my judgment before God and Jesus later.

I like that whole, “Judge not and YE SHALL NOT BE JUDGED” part. I’m totally holding Jesus to that one.

Comments

DXM says

March 10, 2015 at 4:31 pm

Skyrim, I hear you, but I can’t help thinking that your views on homosexuality are too influenced by today’s standards. Yes, many gay folks do truly love their partners, there’s no denying it, as do many straight atheists, but all of that will not amount to a hill of beans in the end…God didn’t set up anyone to fail, I don’t believe, but of course, there’s plenty of evidence that some people are/were destined for, uh, “less than glory.” Nonetheless, there is an element of choice in all our lives – even Hitler had one at some point.

The “born this way” argument misses the big picture about the fallen world, sin, God’s standards, etc. I was born with my own set of broken inclinations. It’s recognizing these and seeking God’ forgiveness that distinguishes us…and nothing else. Telling someoens else they are sinning may not be a great plan, but denying that a sin is a sin at all…that’s a problem.

Sorry to get so “preachy” on a conspiracy site…

One other thing BSL said really struck me, something I’ve heard emphasized elsewhere recently – the enemy wants your soul above all else. Then he’s “won” something. 98% ice cream and 2% dog poop is still neither edible nor healthy…watch out lest ye be decieved. The number of warnings about this in the Bible is striking…
- Skyrim Fiend says
  
  March 11, 2015 at 6:09 pm
  
  I understand what you’re saying but I’m not a Jew. I am a follower of Jesus. Jesus had ample opportunity to address homosexuality and didn’t. He condensed the 613 (or 663 depending on if you’re Hasidic/Chasidic) into 2 and at certain points even addressed the “Law” as being from Moses instead of God (Moses gave you those laws for the hardness of your hearts, but I tell you from the beginning it was not so). He does discuss marriage, that there is no excuse for divorce, that there is a proper relationship, but also that in Heaven there is no such thing as male or female. If homosexuality was an abomination as many protestants define it, then he would have called it out with the same rancor as he did usury, money lending, hypocrisy, and a lack of charity.
  
  In fact, if sexual sins were unforgivable then he would not have saved the adulteress from a TANAKH mandated stoning. That was also the law.
  
  He said we have two commandments, love God and love our neighbor as ourselves. We do have, however, a guidance for a proper way to live that is respectful to ourselves, nature, and others.
  
  Even still, what we see in Leviticus was a priestly code that would set that class of Jew above in purity, and was not necessarily given what we know of Jews then something that everyone would be able to aspire to. It is why there is a phrase used S-yag la Torah (to build a fence around the Torah) because people just couldn’t do it. Moreover, within that code the same words are used “unclean” which is just not the same as abomination. That same word is used for the breaking of any of those laws from lying to what you do on the Sabbath.
  
  There are more instances that condemn people for not taking the Sabbath as a day of complete rest (not Golf, not barbecuing, etc) but worshiping the Most High than for any sexual sin. It is a day of profound observance, not watching football. There are more instances that condemn people who choose not to forgive others of sins (read up on that period between Rosh Hashana and Yom Kippur) than for homosexuality. People who do not forgive monetary debts after 7 years are also condemned, so why do we think low of people who declare bankruptcy? Why do we not protest FICO scores?
  
  In the book of Matthew Chapter 25 Jesus absolutely predicates our salvation on good works but because of Paul we throw that out and believe in this idea that all we have do is accept Jesus as Savior. I dunno.
  
  Either Jesus is Messiah and the Gospels are our religion with his words as the final say on God’s will or we (people claiming Christianity) should all just be Jews who see the Torah as fulfilled and worship as Orthodox Jews.
  
  I am so imperfect, flawed, and hopeless that I’ll stick with the Gospels.
  
  It is not a mark of trying to accept modern ways because I don’t think that homosexuality is the intended sexual relations for humans. Penises…vaginas…obviously God (and for the atheists–what evolution produced as the most survivable and advantageous solution) intended for that to be the way to procreate and the way we should raise families.
  
  However, I don’t see sexual “sins” as different than me lying to my boss about being sick. That wasn’t true. It’s not different than me lying to my auto loan company when I forgot to mail the check. We all sin and every sin has equal weight because it is all wrong.
  
  If we have a hierarchy of sin, then it should be as Jesus said and that is that sin which hurts our neighbor that we are to love as ourself.
  
  I’m not being an apologist, I just see that it is easy to say that this group or that group is “worse” because that particular group and it’s push for acceptance is leading to a whole breakdown of culture and religious tradition unintentionally.
  
  The average gay person just wants to live their life and be happy. Some are radical and want to destroy tradition, but most just want to come home from work and have someone there with them that loves them. Do I alienate that person or persons from the love of Christ by telling them their sin?
  
  Maybe if I was perfect I could, but I’m a horrible hypocrite in so many ways that I would be frightened of my judgment before God and Jesus later.
  
  I like that whole, “Judge not and YE SHALL NOT BE JUDGED” part. I’m totally holding Jesus to that one.
  - Skyrim Fiend says
    
    March 11, 2015 at 6:12 pm
    
    **amend/clarify, we have to accept Jesus as Messiah AND do good works or he’ll say he has no idea who we are.
    
    He said feed the poor, cloth the poor, care for the sick, for those in prison and you care for me.
    
    I didn’t meant for people to infer that we are still Christians if we don’t believe Jesus is Messiah.
  - IlluminatiWatcher says
    
    March 12, 2015 at 4:48 am
    
    Here here! Well said Skyrim. You broke that down far more eloquently than I could’ve! But that’s basically my same feelings on the issue.

« Older Comments

Newer Comments »