Hello everyone! This is Isaac Weishaupt from IlluminatiWatcher.com. Today we’ll wrapping up the five-part guest post by Ken Ammi about the post gender movement.
Ken is an independent researcher who has been exposing symbolism and explaining the agenda, and I believe that there are some valid arguments being raised over the course of these five posts. It seems to coincide with my theories that transhumanism is the ULTIMATE goal of the Illuminati- and they’ll ANYONE or ANYTHING to get the agenda through.
Without further ado, you can read this fifth and final post in the series below (*you can start at the beginning and read part one: The Occult Roots of the Postgender Movement HERE).
The Postgenderism Worldview and Literature
Herein we conclude, from part 1, part 2, part 3 and part 4, considering the paper Postgenderism: Beyond the Gender Binary by George Dvorsky and James Hughes, PhD (Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies – IEET Monograph Series, March 3, 2008 AD).
We will consider the evolutionary worldview behind the postgender movement which sees our bio-chemistry, and thus our gender, as being arbitrary. How radical feminism plays into it. That which I will term re-education with regards to gender issues. The ultimate goal(s) of the movement. And transhumanism.
We have already noted, in passing, that since on a reductionist, naturalist, materialist worldview we are nothing but accidentally conscious combinations of chemicals; what is the difference between one combination or another?
Note the evolutionary premise in, for example, referring, as the paper does to, “Biological gender dimorphism” (existence of two or more different forms within a biological species aka female and male).
There are, of course, also references to “our accidental binary gender assignments (Geary, 2006; Ridley, 2003).”
So our binary gender is the byproduct of accidental biology, as per this particular and peculiar worldview. Here is some more form the paper:
Today however, our Enlightenment values and emergent human potentials have come into conflict with the rigid gender binary.
Efforts to ameliorate patriarchy and the disabilities of binary gender through social, educational, political and economic reform can only achieve so much so long as the material basis, biological gendering of the body, brain and reproduction, remains fixed.
…the transcending of gender by social and political means is now being complemented and completed by technological means.
Technological progress is ameliorating these gender differences, but only the blurring and erosion of biological sex, of the gendering of the brain, and of binary social roles by emerging technologies will enable individuals to access all human potentials and experiences regardless of their born sex or assumed gender.
Some “Intersexual characters” references within the paper are found within the following texts:
Charlotte Perkins Gilman, Herland (1915 AD) according to which, “women reproduce parthenogenetically and only have daughters.”
Ursula K. LeGuin, Left Hand of Darkness (1969 AD), “depicts a society that has engineered itself to be neuter for most of each month, except for a period of heat in which they become either male or female.”
Lois McMaster Bujold, The Miles Vorkosigan series “has a hermaphrodite character from a postgender society that has intentionally genetically engineered itself so that all its members are hermaphrodites.”
Jeffrey Eugenides, Middlesex (2002 AD; this destruction of traditional gender and roles made it into Oprah’s Book Club) features, “chromosomally male but appears to have a vagina, and is raised as a girl until becoming male as an adolescent.”
Ian McDonald, River of Gods (2004 AD):
…proposes a new sexual identity and subculture, neuters or “nutes,” that evolve out of the hijra cult in India, and whose members have their external sex organs surgically redesigned into a smooth androgynous form, whose brains are genetically adjusted to an androgynous condition, and who are given a set of internal controls over their sexual responses which have a broader range than male or female orgasms.
Gender issues considered from a Judeo-Christian perspective are:
Alexander Strauch, Men and Women: Equal Yet Different: A brief study of the Biblical Passages on Gender (1999 AD).
John Piper and Wayne Grudem, Recovering Biblical Manhood and Womanhood (Redesign): A Response to Evangelical Feminism (2012 AD).
George W. Knight III, Role Relationships of Men and Women: New Testament Teaching (1989 AD)
 Geary, David C., “Male, Female: The Evolution of Sex Differences,” American Psychological Association, 2006 AD
What are your thoughts on all of this? Could the Illuminati be orchestrating some type of post gender neutrality agenda? I believe it’s a part of the transhuman movement where they seek to become gods of their world (a digital one), but they must first get us to subscribe to their occult beliefs first.
In my opinion they are taking advantage of people that HONESTLY part of the LGBT community in order to get the Illuminati/occult plans through.
Leave a comment at the bottom and let us know what YOU think.
Here is where you can connect with the author of this guest post- Ken Ammi:
Thanks again for reading and be sure to follow Ken Ammi and IlluminatiWatcher on social media!