The Postgenderism Worldview and Literature

Hello everyone! This is Isaac Weishaupt from Today we’ll wrapping up the five-part guest post by Ken Ammi about the post gender movement.

Ken is an independent researcher who has been exposing symbolism and explaining the agenda, and I believe that there are some valid arguments being raised over the course of these five posts. It seems to coincide with my theories that transhumanism is the ULTIMATE goal of the Illuminati- and they’ll ANYONE or ANYTHING to get the agenda through.


Without further ado, you can read this fifth and final post in the series below (*you can start at the beginning and read part one: The Occult Roots of the Postgender Movement HERE).



The Postgenderism Worldview and Literature

Herein we conclude, from part 1, part 2, part 3 and part 4, considering the paper Postgenderism: Beyond the Gender Binary by George Dvorsky and James Hughes, PhD (Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies – IEET Monograph Series, March 3, 2008 AD).

We will consider the evolutionary worldview behind the postgender movement which sees our bio-chemistry, and thus our gender, as being arbitrary. How radical feminism plays into it. That which I will term re-education with regards to gender issues. The ultimate goal(s) of the movement. And transhumanism.

We have already noted, in passing, that since on a reductionist, naturalist, materialist worldview we are nothing but accidentally conscious combinations of chemicals; what is the difference between one combination or another?

Note the evolutionary premise in, for example, referring, as the paper does to, “Biological gender dimorphism” (existence of two or more different forms within a biological species aka female and male).

Postgender - androgyny and hermaphroditism - 11

There are, of course, also references to “our accidental binary gender assignments (Geary, 2006; Ridley, 2003).”[1]

So our binary gender is the byproduct of accidental biology, as per this particular and peculiar worldview. Here is some more form the paper:


Today however, our Enlightenment values and emergent human potentials have come into conflict with the rigid gender binary.

Efforts to ameliorate patriarchy and the disabilities of binary gender through social, educational, political and economic reform can only achieve so much so long as the material basis, biological gendering of the body, brain and reproduction, remains fixed.

…the transcending of gender by social and political means is now being complemented and completed by technological means.

Technological progress is ameliorating these gender differences, but only the blurring and erosion of biological sex, of the gendering of the brain, and of binary social roles by emerging technologies will enable individuals to access all human potentials and experiences regardless of their born sex or assumed gender.

Postgender - androgyny and hermaphroditism - 13

Some “Intersexual characters” references within the paper are found within the following texts:

Charlotte Perkins Gilman, Herland (1915 AD) according to which, “women reproduce parthenogenetically and only have daughters.”

“The idea of female-only reproduction” is also found within Joanna Russ, The Female Man (1975 AD) and Suzy McKee Charnas’ Motherlines (1978 AD) and The Furies (1995 AD).

Ursula K. LeGuin, Left Hand of Darkness (1969 AD), “depicts a society that has engineered itself to be neuter for most of each month, except for a period of heat in which they become either male or female.”

Lois McMaster Bujold, The Miles Vorkosigan series “has a hermaphrodite character from a postgender society that has intentionally genetically engineered itself so that all its members are hermaphrodites.”

Jeffrey Eugenides, Middlesex (2002 AD; this destruction of traditional gender and roles made it into Oprah’s Book Club) features, “chromosomally male but appears to have a vagina, and is raised as a girl until becoming male as an adolescent.”

Ian McDonald, River of Gods (2004 AD):

…proposes a new sexual identity and subculture, neuters or “nutes,” that evolve out of the hijra cult in India, and whose members have their external sex organs surgically redesigned into a smooth androgynous form, whose brains are genetically adjusted to an androgynous condition, and who are given a set of internal controls over their sexual responses which have a broader range than male or female orgasms.

Postgender - androgyny and hermaphroditism - 12

Gender issues considered from a Judeo-Christian perspective are:

Alexander Strauch, Men and Women: Equal Yet Different: A brief study of the Biblical Passages on Gender (1999 AD).

John Piper and Wayne Grudem, Recovering Biblical Manhood and Womanhood (Redesign): A Response to Evangelical Feminism (2012 AD).

George W. Knight III, Role Relationships of Men and Women: New Testament Teaching (1989 AD)



[1] Geary, David C., “Male, Female: The Evolution of Sex Differences,” American Psychological Association, 2006 AD


What are your thoughts on all of this? Could the Illuminati be orchestrating some type of post gender neutrality agenda? I believe it’s a part of the transhuman movement where they seek to become gods of their world (a digital one), but they must first get us to subscribe to their occult beliefs first.

In my opinion they are taking advantage of people that HONESTLY part of the LGBT community in order to get the Illuminati/occult plans through.

Leave a comment at the bottom and let us know what YOU think.

Here is where you can connect with the author of this guest post- Ken Ammi:

True Freethinker:






Thanks again for reading and be sure to follow Ken Ammi and IlluminatiWatcher on social media!



Author: Isaac Weishaupt

Share This Post On


  1. Did anyone see when Ben Shapiro and Zoey Tur were guest panelists on Dr. Drew in the Caitlyn Jenner segment 7-16-15? Zoey was very rude to Ben and even cattily threatened him (something to the effect of “little boy, you’ll be going home in nappies”). I didn’t recall seeing anybody calling Zoey out for being disrespectful AND putting his hand on Ben. Instead, people said stuff like “Well, you knew Zoey would be offended/sensitive”…
    Some of these folks love to pretend they’re so glad everyone is “having a dialogue” and “talking about the important things”, except for when someone expresses a different opinion. Then it’s “hatred” and “intolerance”. (I’m not going to say “liberal”/”conservative” because I’m sick of those terms.)

    Post a Reply
  2. Apparently, I heard some of the words wrong, but The Blaze and Breitbart have reported on this.

    Post a Reply
    • I saw it and was disgusted. First off, to play this off as a “balanced discussion” was a bad joke at best, but is more and more common with the advent of “news-talk” shows (like “The View”, MSNBC, or FOX News) where all the participants but one share the same, rabid perspective. The odd-man-out gets jumped the same way every time.

      Second, it’s not like Shapiro said anything that isn’t true, though I suppose it could have been said more diplomatically. However, he was the lone voice facing a crowd of thugs.

      This clearly wasn’t about Jenner. I noticed no one took such umbrage with the militant Marxist black guy. This isn’t really about transgenderism (I mean, do the Elite really care about them?). This was about demonstrating what happens to those who go against the narrative.

      The double-standard at play here is sickening: if this were reversed, where the Conservative grabbed the neck of a Progressive and snarled a similar threat as Zoey did, all hell would break loose. Assault charges would be filed. Complaints would be made. Viewers would boycott.

      This all reminds me of the Red Guards in China in the 50s and 60s. Same rhetoric. Same playbook. Heaven help us.

      BTW: I have my doubts about Jenner’s authenticity. I suspect s/he’s being blackmailed or otherwise threatened. Somebody else is writing the script for her.

      Post a Reply
      • I agree with your last paragraph as well. Something does seem extra contrived about the whole thing.

        BTW, I’ve heard Ben Shapiro is pressing assault/battery charges! Dr. Drew mentioned this on Monday’s show briefly.

        Post a Reply
  3. Truth About Caitlyn Jenner What The Media Won’t Say

    Post a Reply
    • Wait…LeBron James???

      The only thing shocking about RSJ’s video is that any of this needs to be said.

      Jeez, devolution is FAST.

      Post a Reply


  1. True Freethinker - Postgenderism Literature and Worldview My most recent guest post on the Illuminati Watcher site is titled The Postgenderism Worldview and…

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.